Doctors, religious, lawyers and relatives of terminally ill patients, leave testimonials that make us reflect on the topic. Weather some are convinced that there is better ways to go about pain such as hospice to provide them with more comfort, others maintain the idea that euthanasia should be given because people are free to choose how they want to die to end their suffering.
Rightly so. In the status quo, people who are registered donors are at times kept on life support against against their will, something we though, the proposition did not like to determine the organs sustainability for transplant. Euthanasia could possible provide those who are suffering the relief they so desperately long for.
The conflict is driven by the opinion gap whether accept the notion of euthanasia or should not be allowed. In the point of view on life extension, euthanasia is undoubtedly one of controversial issue in modern society. If an individual does this, the individual believes that there is a morality outside of religious morality above the standard for which the biblical or context in which religion takes place and thus it is moot whether the bible says so or not.
The position taken by this paper on the use of euthanasia is one that is opposed by the Kantian theory. Many people consider this practice to be against all ethics. It is not a situation of "Surely it is wrong to give one or two individuals the right to decide whether a patient should live or die?
To summarize, the conflict based on the concept of euthanasia was originally depend on difference between religious concept and modernized concept. While this concern is certainly respectable, it is based simply on predicative fears.